Pharma company FDA records
21 warning letters, 68 OPDP letters and 47 published complete response letters across 53 large pharma companies in FDA records since 2022. Every count is a public FDA record, with the period and method stated; each company page links the records to FDA.
- Companies: 53
- Calendar years: 2022 to 2026
- Inspection fiscal years: 2022 to 2026
- Newest record: 2026-11-03
OPDP letters
2022 to 2026. OPDP untitled and warning letters about drug promotion, by letter date.
- AstraZeneca8 letters
- Bristol Myers Squibb5 letters
- Novartis5 letters
- AbbVie4 letters
- Eli Lilly4 letters
- UCB4 letters
Warning letters
2022 to 2026. CDER, CDRH and CBER warning letters, by letter date.
- Aurobindo Pharma4 letters
- Eli Lilly3 letters
- CSL2 letters
- Novo Nordisk2 letters
- Sanofi2 letters
- Sun Pharma2 letters
- Viatris2 letters
Complete response letters
2022 to 2026. Letters FDA has published, by letter date.
- Regeneron5 letters
- Dr. Reddy's Laboratories4 letters
- AbbVie3 letters
- Eli Lilly3 letters
- Hikma Pharmaceuticals3 letters
Drug recall events
2022 to 2026. Human drug recall events in FDA's enforcement reports, by initiation date.
- Sun Pharma56 events
- Teva39 events
- Aurobindo Pharma34 events
- Dr. Reddy's Laboratories31 events
- Viatris27 events
OAI inspections
2022 to 2026. Drug and biologic inspections FDA classified Official Action Indicated, by fiscal year.
- Aurobindo Pharma7 inspections
- Sun Pharma3 inspections
- Cipla2 inspections
- Sanofi2 inspections
7 more companies have 1.
All 53 Companies
In alphabetical order. Open a company for its records.| Company | Approvals | Warning letters | CRLs | OPDP letters | Recall events | OAI inspections |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AbbVie | 8 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuticals | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Amgen | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Amneal Pharmaceuticals | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 0 |
| argenx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Astellas | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| AstraZeneca | 14 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| Aurobindo Pharma | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 7 |
| Bausch Health | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Bayer | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| BeOne Medicines | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Biogen | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BioMarin Pharmaceutical | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Boehringer Ingelheim | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Bristol Myers Squibb | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Chugai Pharmaceutical | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cipla | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 21 | 2 |
| CSL | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Daiichi Sankyo | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dr. Reddy's Laboratories | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 31 | 0 |
| Eisai | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eli Lilly | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Genmab | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gilead Sciences | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Grifols | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GSK | 8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Hikma Pharmaceuticals | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 14 | 0 |
| Incyte | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Ipsen | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Jazz Pharmaceuticals | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Johnson & Johnson | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kyowa Kirin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lundbeck | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Merck & Co. (MSD) | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Merck KGaA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Novartis | 11 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 1 |
| Novo Nordisk | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Ono Pharmaceutical | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Organon | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Otsuka | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Pfizer | 13 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 1 |
| Regeneron | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Roche | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Sandoz | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Sanofi | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Shionogi | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun Pharma | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 56 | 3 |
| Takeda | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Teva | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 39 | 0 |
| UCB | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| United Therapeutics | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Viatris | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 1 |
Counts are facts from public FDA records (openFDA, the FDA Data Dashboard and FDA letter pages), counted by the method under Methods and coverage. They say nothing about how any company compares with its size, its number of products or its number of sites. Methods and coverage · Updated Nov 12, 2026
Methods and coverage
Which companies are listed
One rule applies to all 53 companies: the main business is prescription drugs or biologics, the group reports on its own, and revenue for its most recent completed fiscal year is at least US$3.0 billion. That year is calendar 2025 for December reporters and the year to March 2026 for Japanese and Indian groups with a March year end. The 24 largest are taken from Fierce Pharma's 2025 top 20 plus the four it names next; every other figure is from SEC filings (XBRL company facts) or the company's own results release, linked on each company page.
Foreign currency is converted at an approximate average rate, stated beside each figure, and a company is listed only if it still clears US$3.0 billion with its currency 5% weaker. Those rates are our assumption, not a published figure. A company with no FDA record under its own name in these sources is left off, because its page would be empty. The Tokyo-listed subsidiaries Chugai and Kyowa Kirin are counted as their own companies, apart from Roche and Kirin.
Considered and left off:
| Company | Why it is not listed |
|---|---|
| Moderna, Neurocrine Biosciences, Exelixis | 2025 revenue of US$1.94 billion, US$2.86 billion and US$2.32 billion (Forms 10-K, SEC XBRL company facts), below the line. |
| Zydus Lifesciences | Fiscal 2026 pharma business revenue of about 220 billion rupees, near US$2.5 billion (company), below the line; the rest is consumer products. |
| Lupin | Fiscal 2026 sales of 274.9 billion rupees (company), about US$3.1 billion at 88.5 rupees but under US$3.0 billion with the rupee 5% weaker, so inside the currency margin. |
| Perrigo | 2025 revenue of US$4.25 billion (Form 10-K), but mainly consumer self-care products, not prescription drugs. |
| Fresenius Kabi | A segment of Fresenius SE, which is not a drug company overall. Its sites appear in FDA records under Fresenius Kabi names. |
| BioNTech | 2025 revenue of 2.87 billion euros, about US$3.2 billion, but FDA's drug, recall, letter and inspection records hold nothing under its name, so its page would be empty. |
| Sumitomo Pharma | Fiscal 2025 revenue could not be read from a primary source close enough to US$3.0 billion to decide. |
| Servier, Menarini, Intas, Apotex | Private groups; no audited revenue figure was checked, so none is listed. |
How FDA records are matched to a company
FDA names the firm on every record in its own way: "Pfizer Inc.", "Hospira, Inc.", "Wyeth Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.". A record belongs to a company when the firm name contains that company's name or the name of a subsidiary it owns today, as whole words, or equals a short name we reviewed one by one (such as "Lilly" or "Merck" in Drugs@FDA). A record is counted under the entity FDA names, for all dates, so a record from before an acquisition is counted with the current owner. A name that two companies could claim is left out of both, so counts can be lower than a company's true total.
The full matching table is a CSV. These are the names we left out on purpose:
| Name in FDA records | Why it is not attributed |
|---|---|
| Watson Laboratories, Actavis (all forms) | Owned by Teva today, but the Actavis name also covers the branded business that went to AbbVie. A name without "Teva" in it is not attributed. |
| ViiV Healthcare | GSK holds 78.3%, with Pfizer and Shionogi as shareholders. Left unattributed. |
| Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Kenvue | The consumer business became Kenvue in 2023. |
| Novartis Consumer Health, GSK Consumer Healthcare, Wyeth Consumer, Chattem Sanofi | Consumer health units that moved out of the parent (to GSK and then Haleon, or to Opella). Not attributed to either side. |
| Bausch + Lomb | A separately listed company, 88% owned by Bausch Health. |
| Otsuka ICU Medical | A joint venture, not an Otsuka subsidiary. |
| Zydus Hospira Oncology | A joint venture, not a Pfizer subsidiary. |
| Westwood-Squibb | Shares a name origin with Bristol Myers Squibb but is a separate company. |
| Taro Pharmaceutical, Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company | Sun Pharma affiliates that are separate legal and listed entities under their own names. |
| Merck Teknika | Could not be tied to Merck KGaA or to Merck & Co. from FDA's data. |
| GlaxoSmithKline Nebraska | Could not tell whether the site belonged to the pharma or the consumer business. |
| Johnson & Johnson Private Limited (India) | A consumer products entity as far as FDA's name shows; left unattributed. |
| Roxane Laboratories | Boehringer Ingelheim sold its Roxane generics business to Hikma in 2016, but "Boehringer Ingelheim Roxane" also appears under Boehringer's own name. A name with only "Roxane" in it is not attributed. |
| AvKARE, Kashiv Biosciences | Amneal affiliates that appear under their own names; the ownership at each record's date was not checked. |
| Kyowa Hakko Bio, Kyowa Chemical Industry | Separate companies that share the Kyowa name, not part of Kyowa Kirin's pharma business. |
| Unither Manufacturing, Laboratoire Unither | A name shared with a French company; the link to United Therapeutics was not confirmed from FDA's data. |
What each source covers and leaves out
- Approvals
- Original NDA and BLA applications with an approved original submission in Drugs@FDA, counted by the approval date. Drugs@FDA lists the company that holds the application today, not the one that held it at approval. It covers many, not all, therapeutic biologics, so BLA counts are incomplete. Supplements, tentative approvals and generic (ANDA) approvals are not counted. Applications of every kind count, including 505(b)(2) and older molecules, so this is not a count of new molecular entities. Source: Original NDA and BLA approvals. openFDA Drugs@FDA, collected daily.
- Complete response letters
- Letters FDA has published in the openFDA transparency dataset. FDA released more than 200 letters on 10 July 2025, all from 2020 to 2024 and all for products later approved. It added 89 letters for applications that were not approved on 4 September 2025 and says it now publishes new letters promptly. Years before 2025 therefore hold only some of the letters FDA sent, and a count of zero does not mean no letter was issued. Source: Complete response letters. openFDA transparency CRL dataset, collected daily.
- Warning letters
- Warning letters from CDER, CDRH and CBER on FDA's site, from a saved snapshot of FDA's pages that FDA's own site does not offer as data. Tobacco, food and veterinary letters are excluded. Coverage starts in 2017. A letter is counted under the firm name it was addressed to, so letters to a contract site that does not carry the company's name are not attributed. Letters about drug promotion also appear in the OPDP count. Source: Warning letters. FDA warning letter pages, snapshot refreshed weekly.
- OPDP letters
- Untitled letters and warning letters from FDA's Office of Prescription Drug Promotion, from May 2017. They concern specific promotional pieces. A promotion warning letter can appear both here and in the warning letter count, so the two counts are not added together. Source: OPDP untitled and warning letters. FDA OPDP letter pages, snapshot refreshed weekly.
- Drug recalls
- Human drug recalls in FDA's enforcement reports through openFDA, counted once per recall event by initiation date. One event can cover many products and lots. Device recalls are not counted, so a company that also makes devices is shown for its drugs only. FDA's class describes the recall's risk, and FDA classifies a recall after the firm starts it. Source: Drug recall events. openFDA drug enforcement reports, collected daily.
- Inspections
- Drug and biologic inspections that FDA has classified, from the FDA Data Dashboard, by FDA fiscal year (1 October to 30 September). An inspection that covers several project areas is counted once at its most serious classification. The counts include clinical investigator and bioresearch monitoring inspections, blood and plasma centers and sites abroad, so a plasma business shows many inspections. NAI is no action indicated, VAI voluntary action indicated and OAI official action indicated. Device inspections are not counted. Source: Inspections classified. FDA Data Dashboard, collected daily.
- Debarments
- FDA's debarment lists name individuals, not companies, so no listed company has a debarment record here.
Work from public records like these
Arca is building an enterprise agent OS for life sciences. Its agents research questions and draft documents from a team's own records, with each claim linked to its source.