What Is GxP? The Good Practice Regulations, Explained
GxP is the umbrella term for the good practice regulations and guidelines that govern how life sciences work is done. The x is a placeholder: swap it for the discipline and you get GMP for manufacturing, GLP for non-clinical laboratory studies, GCP for clinical trials, and so on.
They exist to answer one question a regulator asks of any submission: can this evidence be trusted? Not just whether the product is safe and effective, but whether the records demonstrating it were generated under conditions that make them believable.
The main GxP disciplines
| Term | Covers | US regulation |
|---|---|---|
| GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) | How drugs and biologics are made, tested and released | 21 CFR 210 and 211 |
| GLP (Good Laboratory Practice) | Non-clinical safety studies supporting an application | 21 CFR 58 |
| GCP (Good Clinical Practice) | Conduct of clinical trials, and protection of subjects | 21 CFR 50, 56, 312, 812; ICH E6 |
| GDP (Good Distribution Practice) | Storage and transport through the supply chain | Largely EU; US via cGMP and DSCSA |
| GVP (Good Pharmacovigilance Practice) | Safety monitoring after approval | 21 CFR 314.80; EU GVP modules |
| GDocP (Good Documentation Practice) | How records are written, corrected and retained | Not a standalone rule; enforced through the others |
Two more you will hear that are not regulations:
- GAMP 5 is an ISPE guide to validating computerised systems. Widely used, frequently cited, not legally binding.
- cGMP is GMP with a "current" in front. The lower-case c is deliberate and it does real work: it means the expectation moves as technology and industry practice move. What passed an inspection in 2015 is not automatically enough now.
Medical devices: 21 CFR 820 became the QMSR in February 2026
Device quality has its own track, and it changed recently enough that a lot of material online is out of date.
Since 2 February 2026, FDA's Quality System Regulation has been replaced by the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR). Part 820 now incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference rather than restating requirements in its own words, plus FDA-specific additions retained in Subparts A and B.
The practical effect: Part 820 is much shorter, and for most requirements it points you at the corresponding clause of ISO 13485 instead of spelling it out. If a guide you are reading walks through Part 820 subpart by subpart with its own text for design controls and CAPA, it is describing the pre-2026 regulation.
What GxP compliance actually requires
Across every discipline the same expectations recur.
Written procedures, followed. An SOP that describes something other than what people do is worse than no SOP, because the gap is documented.
Records that show what happened. Contemporaneous, attributable, and complete enough that someone who was not there can reconstruct the event.
Trained people. Training records are among the first things an investigator asks for.
Qualified equipment and validated systems. Including software: if a computerised system holds GxP records, it falls under 21 CFR Part 11.
Deviations investigated, not just logged. A deviation without a root cause and a CAPA is an open finding waiting to be written up.
Change control. Every change assessed for its effect on product quality and on what you have already told the agency.
ALCOA+ : the data integrity test
Regulators assess GxP records against a shorthand called ALCOA, extended to ALCOA+:
- Attributable — you can tell who did it, and when
- Legible — readable, and permanent
- Contemporaneous — recorded as it happened, not reconstructed later
- Original — the first capture, or a verified true copy
- Accurate — correct, and consistent with the rest of the record
Plus: Complete, Consistent, Enduring, Available.
Most data integrity findings are ALCOA failures with a specific name. Backdating a log breaks contemporaneous. A shared login breaks attributable. An audit trail that can be switched off breaks original. Reading a Form 483 or a warning letter with ALCOA in mind makes the findings much easier to anticipate in your own systems.
Who enforces GxP
- FDA inspects US facilities and foreign sites shipping to the US, issuing Form 483 observations, warning letters, import alerts and, at the far end, consent decrees.
- EMA and EU national authorities run their own GMP and GCP inspections and issue EudraGMDP statements of non-compliance.
- MHRA, TGA, PMDA, Health Canada and others inspect within their own jurisdictions, with a growing amount of mutual recognition.
An FDA inspection outcome is not confined to one site. A facility problem at a contract manufacturer can become an approvability issue on your application, which is how a GMP finding turns into a Complete Response Letter.
Frequently asked questions
What does GxP stand for?
Good practice. The x is a placeholder for the discipline: GMP for manufacturing, GLP for non-clinical laboratory studies, GCP for clinical trials, and others.
Is GxP a regulation?
No. GxP is a collective term. The binding requirements sit in specific regulations such as 21 CFR 210 and 211 for GMP, 21 CFR 58 for GLP, and 21 CFR 50, 56 and 312 for GCP.
What is the difference between GMP and cGMP?
The lower-case c means "current". It signals that the expected standard moves with technology and industry practice, so meeting the wording of the regulation is not on its own a defence if common practice has advanced.
Is 21 CFR 820 still in force?
Part 820 still exists, but since 2 February 2026 it incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference as the Quality Management System Regulation, rather than stating device quality requirements in its own text.
What does ALCOA+ mean?
Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original and Accurate, plus Complete, Consistent, Enduring and Available. It is the shorthand regulators use to assess whether records can be trusted.
Is GAMP 5 a regulation?
No. GAMP 5 is an ISPE guide to validating computerised systems. It is widely followed and often cited in inspections, but it is not law.